Delaware, OH · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Methodist Theological School in Ohio

Methodist Theological School in Ohio reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

5.38
Incidents / 1k students
186
Enrolled students

5.38 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Methodist Theological School in Ohio reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
5.38
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 203997 · Methodist Theological School in 5.38/1k score rate

RATE-HIGH · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · ABOVE-PEER · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-HIGH 5.38/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • ABOVE-PEER Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad · +5.38
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 186
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad (-5.38/1k)

Methodist Theological School in Ohio sheet RATE-HIGH · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · ABOVE-PEER · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-HIGH · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · ABOVE-PEER · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad (-5.38/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Methodist Theological School in Ohio reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Methodist Theological School

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Methodist on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Methodist Theological School in Ohio's 5.38/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Methodist Theological School in Ohio was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 OH 4-year peers in this comparison, Methodist Theological School in Ohio is larger than 28% and safer-reporting than 14% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Methodist Theological Scho…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Methodist Theological Scho…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Tri-State Bible College210.00022
Allegheny Wesleyan College600.00322
Rabbinical College Telshe640.00622
Arizona College of Nursing-Cincinnati770.00822
Pontifical College Josephinum880.001122
Cincinnati College of Mortuary Science1070.001422
Antioch College12116.53170
Winebrenner Theological Seminary1220.001922
Payne Theological Seminary1240.002222
Arizona College of Nursing-Cleveland1640.002522
Methodist Theological School in Ohio (this campus)1865.382814
Felbry College1920.003122

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Methodist Theological School in Ohio recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Methodist Theological School in Ohio vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

OH

Methodist Theological School in Ohio

5.38 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
186
Data year
2024

FL

International Academy

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
186
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,308 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Methodist Theological School in Ohio, both outside OH so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Similar 2024 Clery rate (nationwide)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Methodist Theological School in Ohio safe?
Methodist Theological School in Ohio has a safety score of 5.38 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 186 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad. Same-state same-level set: Felbry College (0.00/1k); Arizona College of Nursing-Cleveland (0.00/1k); DeVry University-Ohio (0.00/1k); Art Academy of Cincinnati (0.00/1k); The Modern College of Design (0.00/1k); Payne Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Winebrenner Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); American Institute of Alternative Medicine (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Methodist Theological School in Ohio?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Methodist Theological School in Ohio reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Methodist Theological School in Ohio compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Gemological Institute of America-Carlsbad at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in OH; same-state same-level scored peers include Felbry College (0.00/1k); Arizona College of Nursing-Cleveland (0.00/1k); DeVry University-Ohio (0.00/1k); Art Academy of Cincinnati (0.00/1k); The Modern College of Design (0.00/1k); Payne Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Winebrenner Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); American Institute of Alternative Medicine (0.00/1k).
Does Methodist Theological School in Ohio have fire safety data?
Yes. Methodist Theological School in Ohio reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.