Manhattan, KS · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Manhattan Area Technical College

Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#5
KS rank
878
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 155487 · Manhattan Area Technical College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UPPER #5 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Carolina University · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 878
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Carolina University (+0.00/1k)

Manhattan Area Technical College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Carolina University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Carolina University (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Manhattan Area Technical

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Manhattan on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Manhattan Area Technical College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Manhattan Area Technical College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 28 KS 2-year peers in this comparison, Manhattan Area Technical College is larger than 19% and safer-reporting than 70% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.436.855.173.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 15 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 4Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 26 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 30 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 37 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 48Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 41 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 7 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 4 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 52 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 52Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 59 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 30Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 63 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 59Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 70 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 15Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 74 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 7Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 85 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 26Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 37Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 93 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 63Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 96 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 41Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Manhattan Area Technical C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 70
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 15, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 4
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 26, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 30, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 37, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 48
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 41, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 7, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 4, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 52, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 52
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 59, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 30
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 63, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 59
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 70, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 15
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 74, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 7
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 85, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 26
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 37
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 93, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 63
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 96, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 41
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Manhattan Area Technical C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
WellSpring School of Allied Health-Lawrence370.00070
WellSpring School of Allied Health-Wichita580.00470
Galen Health Institutes-Wichita2330.00770
Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College7527.98110
Independence Community College7647.85154
Manhattan Area Technical College (this campus)8780.001970
Fort Hays Tech North Central9870.002270
Salina Area Technical College1,0160.982633
Pratt Community College1,3220.003070
Fort Scott Community College1,3760.733344
Colby Community College1,4090.713748
Labette Community College1,4261.404119

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Manhattan Area Technical College has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Webber International University.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Manhattan Area Technical College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

KS

Manhattan Area Technical College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
878
Data year
2024

KS

McPherson College

10.25 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,941
Enrollment
878
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Manhattan Area Technical College sits on price and outcomes

See Kansas's cost ranking

At $10,074, Manhattan Area Technical College's reported average net price is cheaper than 25% among 72 Kansas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $15,313.

$10,074
average net price
$15,313
Kansas median
4.7×
six-year earnings to median debt
$3,783
reported income-bracket spread

This institution reports an unusual pattern: families under $30,000 record a HIGHER net price ($12,767) than those above $110,000 ($8,984). Fewer than 2% of institutions reporting both brackets show this shape. It can reflect small bracket samples or programme mix rather than aid policy, so treat it as a question to raise with the financial-aid office rather than a finding.

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $44,928 - about 4.5 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. 70% complete within six years, so roughly 30% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$9,844
Out-of-State Tuition
$9,844
Avg Net Price
$10,074
Median Debt
$9,500
Pell Grant Recipients
11%
How does this cost rank in KS? →

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$44,928
Median Earnings (10yr)
$51,864
Loan Repayment (3yr)
69%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,185 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Manhattan Area Technical College, both outside KS so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Manhattan Area Technical College safe?
Manhattan Area Technical College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Fort Hays Tech North Central (0.00/1k); Independence Community College (7.85/1k); Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College (7.98/1k); Salina Area Technical College (0.98/1k); Pratt Community College (0.00/1k); Fort Scott Community College (0.73/1k); Colby Community College (0.71/1k); Labette Community College (1.40/1k).
What crimes are reported at Manhattan Area Technical College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Manhattan Area Technical College compare to similar schools?
Manhattan Area Technical College reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Webber International University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Webber International University (1.14/1k); McPherson College (10.25/1k); Martin Luther College (11.39/1k); Oklahoma Wesleyan University (3.41/1k); Carolina University (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Fort Hays Tech North Central (0.00/1k); Independence Community College (7.85/1k); Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College (7.98/1k); Salina Area Technical College (0.98/1k); Pratt Community College (0.00/1k); Fort Scott Community College (0.73/1k); Colby Community College (0.71/1k); Labette Community College (1.40/1k).
Does Manhattan Area Technical College have fire safety data?
Manhattan Area Technical College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.