KS
Manhattan, KS · Clery Act 2024 · Public
Manhattan Area Technical College
Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- #5
- KS rank
- 878
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 155487 · Manhattan Area Technical College 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UPPER #5 in state
- PEER-FINISH Carolina University · ±0.00
- ZERO-FILED Zero filed
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 878
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Carolina University (+0.00/1k)
Manhattan Area Technical College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Carolina University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Carolina University (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Manhattan Area Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Manhattan Area Technical
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Manhattan on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Manhattan Area Technical College · this campus · lowest 0
Manhattan Area Technical College — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Carolina University · near 0
Carolina University — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Webber International University · near 1.14
Webber International University — near
1.14 per 1,000 students
- Oklahoma Wesleyan University · near 3.41
Oklahoma Wesleyan University — near
3.41 per 1,000 students
- Martin Luther College · highest peer
Martin Luther College — highest peer
11.39 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Manhattan Area Technical College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Manhattan Area Technical College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 28 KS 2-year peers in this comparison, Manhattan Area Technical College is larger than 19% and safer-reporting than 70% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 15, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 4
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 26, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 30, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 37, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 48
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 41, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 7, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 4, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 52, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 52
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 59, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 30
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 63, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 59
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 70, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 15
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 74, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 7
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 85, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 26
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 37
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 93, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 63
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 96, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 41
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
- Manhattan Area Technical C…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 70
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WellSpring School of Allied Health-Lawrence | 37 | 0.00 | 0 | 70 |
| WellSpring School of Allied Health-Wichita | 58 | 0.00 | 4 | 70 |
| Galen Health Institutes-Wichita | 233 | 0.00 | 7 | 70 |
| Fort Hays State University-Northwest Kansas Technical College | 752 | 7.98 | 11 | 0 |
| Independence Community College | 764 | 7.85 | 15 | 4 |
| Manhattan Area Technical College (this campus) | 878 | 0.00 | 19 | 70 |
| Fort Hays Tech North Central | 987 | 0.00 | 22 | 70 |
| Salina Area Technical College | 1,016 | 0.98 | 26 | 33 |
| Pratt Community College | 1,322 | 0.00 | 30 | 70 |
| Fort Scott Community College | 1,376 | 0.73 | 33 | 44 |
| Colby Community College | 1,409 | 0.71 | 37 | 48 |
| Labette Community College | 1,426 | 1.40 | 41 | 19 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Manhattan Area Technical College has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Webber International University.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Manhattan Area Technical College vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
FL
Webber International University
KS
McPherson College
Cost context
Where Manhattan Area Technical College sits on price and outcomes
At $10,074, Manhattan Area Technical College's reported average net price is cheaper than 25% among 72 Kansas colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $15,313.
- $10,074
- average net price
- $15,313
- Kansas median
- 4.7×
- six-year earnings to median debt
- $3,783
- reported income-bracket spread
This institution reports an unusual pattern: families under $30,000 record a HIGHER net price ($12,767) than those above $110,000 ($8,984). Fewer than 2% of institutions reporting both brackets show this shape. It can reflect small bracket samples or programme mix rather than aid policy, so treat it as a question to raise with the financial-aid office rather than a finding.
Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $44,928 - about 4.5 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. 70% complete within six years, so roughly 30% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.
Academic & Financial Profile
Tuition & Costs
- In-State Tuition
- $9,844
- Out-of-State Tuition
- $9,844
- Avg Net Price
- $10,074
- Median Debt
- $9,500
- Pell Grant Recipients
- 11%
Outcomes
- Median Earnings (6yr)
- $44,928
- Median Earnings (10yr)
- $51,864
- Loan Repayment (3yr)
- 69%
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,185 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate
Two Clery-derived peer sets for Manhattan Area Technical College, both outside KS so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).
Similar enrollment (nationwide)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manhattan Area Technical College safe?
What crimes are reported at Manhattan Area Technical College?
How does Manhattan Area Technical College compare to similar schools?
Does Manhattan Area Technical College have fire safety data?
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.