Louisville, KY · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
103
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 157298 · Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Empire Beauty School-Union · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 103
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Empire Beauty School-Union (+0.00/1k)

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Empire Beauty School-Union. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Empire Beauty School-Union (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Louisville Presbyterian Theological

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Louisville on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 KY 4-year peers in this comparison, Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary is larger than 6% and safer-reporting than 75% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105019.739.459.178.8Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Louisville Presbyterian Th…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 75
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Louisville Presbyterian Th…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 75
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Lexington Theological Seminary820.00075
Kentucky Mountain Bible College940.00375
Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary (this campus)1030.00675
Clear Creek Baptist Bible College18321.8680
American National University-Pikeville4442.251142
Simmons College of Kentucky5063.951428
Beckfield College-Florence5360.001775
Kentucky Christian University5507.271917
Alice Lloyd College5891.702247
Brescia University6908.70256
Kentucky Wesleyan College8870.002875
Transylvania University1,0062.983133

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Empire Beauty School-Union.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

KY

Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
103
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,296 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary safe?
Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 103 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Empire Beauty School-Union. Same-state same-level set: Kentucky Mountain Bible College (0.00/1k); Lexington Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Clear Creek Baptist Bible College (21.86/1k); American National University-Pikeville (2.25/1k); Simmons College of Kentucky (3.95/1k); Beckfield College-Florence (0.00/1k); Kentucky Christian University (7.27/1k); Alice Lloyd College (1.70/1k).
What crimes are reported at Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Empire Beauty School-Union at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in KY; same-state same-level scored peers include Kentucky Mountain Bible College (0.00/1k); Lexington Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Clear Creek Baptist Bible College (21.86/1k); American National University-Pikeville (2.25/1k); Simmons College of Kentucky (3.95/1k); Beckfield College-Florence (0.00/1k); Kentucky Christian University (7.27/1k); Alice Lloyd College (1.70/1k).
Does Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary have fire safety data?
Yes. Louisville Presbyterian Theological Seminary reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.