New York, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

LIM College

LIM College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#25
NY rank
1,467
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

LIM College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 192271 · LIM College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #25 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Sauk Valley Community College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 1,467
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Sauk Valley Community College (+0.00/1k)

LIM College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Sauk Valley Community College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Sauk Valley Community College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

LIM College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around LIM College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest LIM on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around LIM College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

LIM College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY 4-year peers in this comparison, LIM College is larger than 72% and safer-reporting than 58% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105015.230.445.760.9Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14LIM College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • LIM College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences9087.71014
Helene Fuld College of Nursing9140.00358
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art9331.07653
Paul Smiths College of Arts and Science9481.05856
Hilbert College9680.001158
Five Towns College9742.051444
United States Merchant Marine Academy9763.071733
Central Yeshiva Tomchei Tmimim Lubavitz9860.001958
Plaza College1,0020.002258
New York Law School1,0620.002558
Trocaire College1,0690.002858
LIM College (this campus)1,4670.007258

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

LIM College recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Sauk Valley Community College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

LIM College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

LIM College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
1,467
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where LIM College sits on price and outcomes

See New York's cost ranking

At $38,667, LIM College's reported average net price is cheaper than 92% among 326 New York colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $17,940.

$38,667
average net price
$17,940
New York median
1.9×
six-year earnings to median debt
$6,523
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $34,978 and those above $110,000 report $41,501, a difference of just $6,523. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

Median earnings six years after entry ($45,359) are less than 1.2 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$33,504
Out-of-State Tuition
$33,504
Avg Net Price
$38,667
Median Debt
$24,000
Pell Grant Recipients
38%
How does this cost rank in NY? →

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
96%
SAT Average
1035
SAT Math Range
460-558
ACT Range
19-25

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
52%
Retention Rate
73%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$45,359
Median Earnings (10yr)
$58,956
Loan Repayment (3yr)
73%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,299 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for LIM College, both outside NY so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is LIM College safe?
LIM College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include New York Medical College (0.00/1k); Weill Medical College of Cornell University (0.00/1k); American Musical and Dramatic Academy (3.44/1k); Albert Einstein College of Medicine (2.81/1k); SUNY Maritime College (0.00/1k); Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology (0.00/1k); Dominican University New York (7.16/1k); Yeshivath Viznitz (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at LIM College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. LIM College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does LIM College compare to similar schools?
LIM College reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Sauk Valley Community College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Sauk Valley Community College (0.00/1k); Coffeyville Community College (0.00/1k); Kettering University (0.00/1k); MyComputerCareer at Raleigh (0.00/1k); Meredith College (3.41/1k). Same-state same-level set: New York Medical College (0.00/1k); Weill Medical College of Cornell University (0.00/1k); American Musical and Dramatic Academy (3.44/1k); Albert Einstein College of Medicine (2.81/1k); SUNY Maritime College (0.00/1k); Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology (0.00/1k); Dominican University New York (7.16/1k); Yeshivath Viznitz (0.00/1k).
Does LIM College have fire safety data?
LIM College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.