Caguas, PR · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
212
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 376330 · Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Phagans School of Hair · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 212
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Phagans School of Hair Design (+0.00/1k)

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Phagans School of Hair Design. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Phagans School of Hair Design (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Liceo de Arte-Dise-O

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Liceo on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 PR Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio is larger than 64% and safer-reporting than 0% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Com…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Com…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Colegio Tecnico de Electricidad Galloza70.0000
American Technical Institute110.0030
Rosslyn Training Academy of Cosmetology210.0060
Puerto Rico Advance Institute290.0080
Leston College490.00110
Colegio Mayor de Tecnologia Inc560.00140
Charlie's Guard-Detective Bureau and Academy Inc570.00170
Modern Hairstyling Institute-Arecibo760.00190
Colegio Educativo Tecnologico Industrial Inc760.00190
Institute of Beauty Careers930.00250
Industrial Technical College1090.00280
Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio (this campus)2120.00640

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Phagans School of Hair Design.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

PR

Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
212
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$12,226
Out-of-State Tuition
$12,226
Pell Grant Recipients
85%

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$13,934
Median Earnings (10yr)
$15,501

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,273 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio safe?
Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 212 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Phagans School of Hair Design. Same-state same-level set: Institucion Chaviano de Mayaguez (0.00/1k); IVAEM College (0.00/1k); MyrAngel Beauty Institute (0.00/1k); Caribbean Aviation Training Institute Inc (0.00/1k); Modern Hairstyling Institute-Carolina (0.00/1k); PPG Technical College (0.00/1k); Automeca Technical College-Caguas (0.00/1k); Escuela Tecnica de Electricidad (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Phagans School of Hair Design at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in PR; same-state same-level scored peers include Institucion Chaviano de Mayaguez (0.00/1k); IVAEM College (0.00/1k); MyrAngel Beauty Institute (0.00/1k); Caribbean Aviation Training Institute Inc (0.00/1k); Modern Hairstyling Institute-Carolina (0.00/1k); PPG Technical College (0.00/1k); Automeca Technical College-Caguas (0.00/1k); Escuela Tecnica de Electricidad (0.00/1k).
Does Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio have fire safety data?
Liceo de Arte-Dise-O y Comercio has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.