Mcalester, OK · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester

Across 2022–2024, Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Burglary). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Western Technology Center.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#15
OK rank
540
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 375726 · Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #15 in state
  • PEER-FINISH The King's University · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-DOWN ↓ 100%
  • CAT-LEAD Burglary
  • ENR-SMALL 540
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: The King's University (+0.00/1k)

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer The King's University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is The King's University (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Kiamichi on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 OK Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester is larger than 89% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Kiamichi Technology Center…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Kiamichi Technology Center…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Yukon Beauty College Inc90.0003
Elite Beauty College100.0033
Academy of Cosmetology, Barbering, and Esthetics190.0063
Southern School of Beauty Inc210.0083
Formations Institute of Cosmetology & Barbering290.00113
Wade Gordon Hairdressing Academy-Oklahoma290.00113
Hello Gorgeous Barbers Stillwater's School of Barbering310.00173
Ponca City Beauty College380.00193
Hair Arts Institute380.00193
Formations Institute390.00253
Durant Institute of Hair Design410.00283
Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester (this campus)5400.00893

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What actually gets reported at Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Burglary.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Fondling and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester: Criminal Offenses by year

Declining 100% (1 → 0 incidents)

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 1On-campus incidents, 2023: 0On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 1 0 ▼ -100.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Burglary 001
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Rape 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

81 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
81 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

OK

Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
540
Data year
2024

TX

The King's University

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
540
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester sits on price and outcomes

See Oklahoma's cost ranking

At $6,569, Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester's reported average net price is cheaper than 18% among 84 Oklahoma colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $12,710.

$6,569
average net price
$12,710
Oklahoma median

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $28,984 - about 4.4 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. Only 47% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$28,984
Median Earnings (10yr)
$31,625

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,135 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester, both outside OK so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester safe?
Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Western Technology Center (0.00/1k); Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center (0.00/1k); Red River Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southern Oklahoma Technology Center (0.00/1k); Green Country Technology Center (0.00/1k); Mid-Del Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pontotoc Technology Center (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is The King's University at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in OK; same-state same-level scored peers include Western Technology Center (0.00/1k); Eastern Oklahoma County Technology Center (0.00/1k); Red River Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pioneer Technology Center (0.00/1k); Southern Oklahoma Technology Center (0.00/1k); Green Country Technology Center (0.00/1k); Mid-Del Technology Center (0.00/1k); Pontotoc Technology Center (0.00/1k).
Does Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester have fire safety data?
Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.