Los Angeles, CA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

KC Beauty Academy

KC Beauty Academy reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
41
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

KC Beauty Academy reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 494658 · KC Beauty Academy 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Gem City College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 41
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Gem City College (+0.00/1k)

KC Beauty Academy sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Gem City College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Gem City College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

KC Beauty Academy reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around KC Beauty Academy

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest KC on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around KC Beauty Academy's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

KC Beauty Academy was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CA Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, KC Beauty Academy is larger than 36% and safer-reporting than 3% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting025.550.976.4101.8013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3KC Beauty Academy: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • KC Beauty Academy: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Medical Career College of Northern California140.0003
Brand College150.0033
American Institute of Massage Therapy190.0063
Lawrence & Company College of Cosmetology210.0083
Salon Success Academy-Fontana290.00113
Princess Institute of Beauty290.00113
Academy of Esthetics and Cosmetology300.00173
Homestead Schools-Costa Mesa320.00193
CalCopa Massage School330.00223
Ukiah Adult School340.00253
Lawrence & Company College of Cosmetology340.00253
KC Beauty Academy (this campus)410.00363

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

KC Beauty Academy recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Gem City College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

KC Beauty Academy vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CA

KC Beauty Academy

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
41
Data year
2024

IL

Gem City College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
41
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where KC Beauty Academy sits on price and outcomes

See California's cost ranking

At $14,542, KC Beauty Academy's reported average net price is cheaper than 35% among 492 California colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $20,161.

$14,542
average net price
$20,161
California median

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 749 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is KC Beauty Academy safe?
KC Beauty Academy has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 41 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Gem City College. Same-state same-level set: Estes Institute of Cosmetology Arts and Science (0.00/1k); Butte County Regional Occupational Program (0.00/1k); Redondo Beach Beauty College (0.00/1k); Thanh Le College School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Universal College of Beauty Inc-Los Angeles 2 (0.00/1k); Hollywood Cultural College (0.00/1k); Waynes College of Beauty (0.00/1k); Stellar Career College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at KC Beauty Academy?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. KC Beauty Academy reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does KC Beauty Academy compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Gem City College at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in CA; same-state same-level scored peers include Estes Institute of Cosmetology Arts and Science (0.00/1k); Butte County Regional Occupational Program (0.00/1k); Redondo Beach Beauty College (0.00/1k); Thanh Le College School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Universal College of Beauty Inc-Los Angeles 2 (0.00/1k); Hollywood Cultural College (0.00/1k); Waynes College of Beauty (0.00/1k); Stellar Career College (0.00/1k).
Does KC Beauty Academy have fire safety data?
KC Beauty Academy has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.