Joliet, IL · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Joliet Junior College

Across 2022–2024, Joliet Junior College reported 2 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, with no net change between the first and last filed year; largest filed category is Fondling.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#10
IL rank
14,414
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Joliet Junior College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 146296 · Joliet Junior College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-MID · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UPPER #10 in state
  • PEER-FINISH CUNY Brooklyn College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-LEAD Fondling
  • ENR-MID 14,414
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: CUNY Brooklyn College (+0.00/1k)

Joliet Junior College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-MID · FIRE-NONE · peer CUNY Brooklyn College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-LEAD · ENR-MID · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is CUNY Brooklyn College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Joliet Junior College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Joliet Junior College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Joliet on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Joliet Junior College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

-2 reported incidents

Joliet Junior College decreased from 2 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IL 2-year peers in this comparison, Joliet Junior College is larger than 97% and safer-reporting than 69% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.136.254.372.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Joliet Junior College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Joliet Junior College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Danville Area Community College2,2970.44042
Richland Community College2,3880.00369
Kankakee Community College2,5640.00669
Illinois Valley Community College2,7200.00869
Prairie State College2,9530.001169
Kishwaukee College2,9690.001469
City Colleges of Chicago-Olive-Harvey College3,1372.23170
John A Logan College3,2240.311950
City Colleges of Chicago-Kennedy-King College3,2741.53226
Morton College3,5620.282556
Kaskaskia College3,6690.002869
Joliet Junior College (this campus)14,4140.009769

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What changed between 2023 and 2024

Reported on-campus incidents at Joliet Junior College fell from 2 to 0 (-100%). The decrease shows up in Fondling (1 to 0) and Rape (1 to 0).

This describes reported incidents, not crime. Clery counts move with reporting policy, awareness campaigns and how a campus staffs its security authorities, so a rise can reflect better capture of reports and a fall can reflect worse capture. One year of movement at a single campus is not a trend.

What actually gets reported at Joliet Junior College

Across 3 reporting years, on-campus incidents were recorded in 2 Clery Act categories here: Fondling and Rape.

The remaining 9 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Incest. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Joliet Junior College: Criminal Offenses by year

Stable

0123 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 0On-campus incidents, 2023: 2On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 0 0 ▲ +0.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 0
2023 2
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Fondling 010
Rape 010
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

45 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
45 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 1 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0

Joliet Junior College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IL

Joliet Junior College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
14,414
Data year
2024

NY

CUNY Brooklyn College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
14,390
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Joliet Junior College sits on price and outcomes

See Illinois's cost ranking

At $1,672, Joliet Junior College's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 178 Illinois colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $15,405.

$1,672
average net price
$15,405
Illinois median
3.7×
six-year earnings to median debt
$3,666
reported income-bracket spread

Aid here is steeply income-scaled. Families reporting under $30,000 of income record a net price of $890, while those above $110,000 record $4,556 - roughly 5.1 times as much. A published average of $1,672 therefore describes very few families well; the bracket nearest your own income is the more useful figure.

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $36,334 - about 21.7 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. Just 21% complete within six years. A completion rate this low means the typical enrolled student leaves without the credential, and cost figures should be read in that light.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$4,530
Out-of-State Tuition
$13,800
Avg Net Price
$1,672
Median Debt
$9,711
Pell Grant Recipients
25%
How does this cost rank in IL? →

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$36,334
Median Earnings (10yr)
$42,889
Loan Repayment (3yr)
58%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 616 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Joliet Junior College, both outside IL so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Joliet Junior College safe?
Joliet Junior College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include William Rainey Harper College (0.29/1k); College of Lake County (0.56/1k); Moraine Valley Community College (1.15/1k); Elgin Community College (0.00/1k); Triton College (0.00/1k); McHenry County College (0.00/1k); City Colleges of Chicago-Malcolm X College (0.43/1k); Southwestern Illinois College (1.53/1k).
What crimes are reported at Joliet Junior College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Joliet Junior College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Joliet Junior College compare to similar schools?
Joliet Junior College reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Southeastern Louisiana University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Southeastern Louisiana University (3.74/1k); CUNY Brooklyn College (0.00/1k); Grossmont College (0.07/1k); University of Toledo (2.16/1k); University of Vermont (2.63/1k). Same-state same-level set: William Rainey Harper College (0.29/1k); College of Lake County (0.56/1k); Moraine Valley Community College (1.15/1k); Elgin Community College (0.00/1k); Triton College (0.00/1k); McHenry County College (0.00/1k); City Colleges of Chicago-Malcolm X College (0.43/1k); Southwestern Illinois College (1.53/1k).
Does Joliet Junior College have fire safety data?
Joliet Junior College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.