Oak Forest, IL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

John Amico School of Hair Design

John Amico School of Hair Design reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
162
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

John Amico School of Hair Design reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 401764 · John Amico School of 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH CET-Colton · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 162
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: CET-Colton (+0.00/1k)

John Amico School of Hair Design sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer CET-Colton. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is CET-Colton (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

John Amico School of Hair Design reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around John Amico School

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest John on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around John Amico School of Hair Design's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

John Amico School of Hair Design was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IL Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, John Amico School of Hair Design is larger than 72% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3John Amico School of Hair …: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • John Amico School of Hair …: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Educators of Beauty College of Cosmetology-Sterling590.0003
Steven Papageorge Hair Academy600.0033
Cannella School of Hair Design-Chicago640.0063
Oehrlein School of Cosmetology650.0083
Estelle Medical Academy660.00113
Illinois Media School-Chicago Campus660.00113
Larry's Barber College680.00173
Cameo Beauty Academy820.00193
CALC Institute of Technology830.00223
Stellar Career College830.00223
Hair Professionals Career College860.00283
John Amico School of Hair Design (this campus)1620.00723

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for John Amico School of Hair Design is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: CET-Colton.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

John Amico School of Hair Design vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IL

John Amico School of Hair Design

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
162
Data year
2024

CA

CET-Colton

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
162
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where John Amico School of Hair Design sits on price and outcomes

See Illinois's cost ranking

At $18,035, John Amico School of Hair Design's reported average net price is cheaper than 57% among 178 Illinois colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $15,405.

$18,035
average net price
$15,405
Illinois median
2.4×
six-year earnings to median debt
$7,395
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $15,915 for families reporting under $30,000 against $23,310 above $110,000, a difference of $7,395. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $18,035 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Median earnings six years after entry ($18,682) are less than 1.0 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. 69% complete within six years, so roughly 31% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,347 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is John Amico School of Hair Design safe?
John Amico School of Hair Design has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 162 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is CET-Colton. Same-state same-level set: Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Libertyville (0.00/1k); University of Spa & Cosmetology Arts (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Chicago (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Chicago NE (6.25/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Rockford (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Normal (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture (0.00/1k); Verve College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at John Amico School of Hair Design?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. John Amico School of Hair Design reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does John Amico School of Hair Design compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is CET-Colton at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in IL; same-state same-level scored peers include Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Libertyville (0.00/1k); University of Spa & Cosmetology Arts (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Chicago (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Chicago NE (6.25/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Rockford (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Normal (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture (0.00/1k); Verve College (0.00/1k).
Does John Amico School of Hair Design have fire safety data?
John Amico School of Hair Design has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.