Morrow, GA · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
117
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 138664 · Interactive College of Technology-Morrow 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Empire Beauty School-Maine · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 117
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Empire Beauty School-Maine (+0.00/1k)

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Empire Beauty School-Maine. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Empire Beauty School-Maine (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Interactive College of

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Interactive on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Interactive College of Technology-Morrow's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 GA 2-year peers in this comparison, Interactive College of Technology-Morrow is larger than 11% and safer-reporting than 28% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Interactive College of Tec…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Interactive College of Tec…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Interactive College of Technology-Gainesville500.00028
Grady Health System Professional Schools610.00328
Miami Ad School-Atlanta650.00628
Gwinnett College-Sandy Springs940.00828
Interactive College of Technology-Morrow (this campus)1170.001128
Helms College1830.001428
Miller-Motte College-Columbus1900.001728
Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus2050.001928
Miller-Motte College-Macon2300.002228
Atlanta Institute of Music and Media2494.02253
Gupton Jones College of Funeral Service3380.002828
Miller-Motte College-Augusta5060.003128

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Interactive College of Technology-Morrow has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Empire Beauty School-Maine.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

GA

Interactive College of Technology-Morrow

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
117
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Interactive College of Technology-Morrow sits on price and outcomes

See Georgia's cost ranking

At $16,844, Interactive College of Technology-Morrow's reported average net price is cheaper than 56% among 124 Georgia colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $16,482.

$16,844
average net price
$16,482
Georgia median
2.7×
six-year earnings to median debt

Six-year median earnings of $28,375 run about 1.7 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. Only 42% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$11,210
Out-of-State Tuition
$11,210
Avg Net Price
$16,844
Median Debt
$10,555
Pell Grant Recipients
65%
How does this cost rank in GA? →

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$28,375
Median Earnings (10yr)
$27,065
Loan Repayment (3yr)
55%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,315 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Interactive College of Technology-Morrow safe?
Interactive College of Technology-Morrow has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 117 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Empire Beauty School-Maine. Same-state same-level set: Gwinnett College-Sandy Springs (0.00/1k); Miami Ad School-Atlanta (0.00/1k); Grady Health System Professional Schools (0.00/1k); Helms College (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology-Gainesville (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Columbus (0.00/1k); Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Macon (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Interactive College of Technology-Morrow?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Interactive College of Technology-Morrow reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Interactive College of Technology-Morrow compare to similar schools?
Interactive College of Technology-Morrow reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Empire Beauty School-Maine. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Empire Beauty School-Maine (0.00/1k); Adult and Continuing Education-BCTS (0.00/1k); Cochran School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Skinworks School of Advanced Skincare (8.55/1k); Los Angeles College of Aesthetics (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Gwinnett College-Sandy Springs (0.00/1k); Miami Ad School-Atlanta (0.00/1k); Grady Health System Professional Schools (0.00/1k); Helms College (0.00/1k); Interactive College of Technology-Gainesville (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Columbus (0.00/1k); Gwinnett College-Marietta Campus (0.00/1k); Miller-Motte College-Macon (0.00/1k).
Does Interactive College of Technology-Morrow have fire safety data?
Interactive College of Technology-Morrow has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.