Louisville, CO · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
32
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 454838 · Institute of Taoist Education 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH The Landing School · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 32
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: The Landing School (+0.00/1k)

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer The Landing School. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is The Landing School (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Institute of Taoist

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Institute on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 CO 4-year peers in this comparison, Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture is larger than 0% and safer-reporting than 69% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.136.254.372.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Institute of Taoist Educat…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Institute of Taoist Educat…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture (this campus)320.00069
Montessori Education Center of the Rockies430.00369
Colorado Chinese Medicine University890.00669
Iliff School of Theology1660.00869
Concorde Career College-Aurora25611.72110
Taft University System3240.001469
Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora3360.001769
Denver College of Nursing8110.001969
Denver Seminary8470.002269
Naropa University1,0943.662531
Trinidad State College1,6137.442814
Morgan Community College1,6260.003169

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: The Landing School.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

CO

Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
32
Data year
2024

ME

The Landing School

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
32
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 584 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture safe?
Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 32 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is The Landing School. Same-state same-level set: Montessori Education Center of the Rockies (0.00/1k); Colorado Chinese Medicine University (0.00/1k); Iliff School of Theology (0.00/1k); Concorde Career College-Aurora (11.72/1k); Taft University System (0.00/1k); Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora (0.00/1k); Denver College of Nursing (0.00/1k); Denver Seminary (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture compare to similar schools?
Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than The Landing School. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: The Landing School (0.00/1k); Del-Mar-Va Beauty Academy (31.25/1k); Summit Christian College (0.00/1k); Pike-Lincoln Technical Center (0.00/1k); Blalock's Professional Beauty College (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Montessori Education Center of the Rockies (0.00/1k); Colorado Chinese Medicine University (0.00/1k); Iliff School of Theology (0.00/1k); Concorde Career College-Aurora (11.72/1k); Taft University System (0.00/1k); Arizona College of Nursing-Aurora (0.00/1k); Denver College of Nursing (0.00/1k); Denver Seminary (0.00/1k).
Does Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture have fire safety data?
Institute of Taoist Education and Acupuncture has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.