New York, NY · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Institute of Culinary Education

Institute of Culinary Education reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#56
NY rank
589
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Institute of Culinary Education reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 457819 · Institute of Culinary Education 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #56 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Concordia Seminary · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 589
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Concordia Seminary (+0.00/1k)

Institute of Culinary Education sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Concordia Seminary. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Concordia Seminary (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Institute of Culinary Education reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Institute of Culinary

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Institute on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Institute of Culinary Education's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Institute of Culinary Education was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 NY Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Institute of Culinary Education is larger than 97% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Institute of Culinary Educ…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Institute of Culinary Educ…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Career School of NY1120.0003
American Beauty School1130.0033
Madison Oneida BOCES-Practical Nursing Program1130.0033
New York School of Esthetics & Day Spa1200.0083
Brittany Beauty Academy1360.00113
Brittany Beauty Academy1410.00143
The Salon Professional Academy-Tonawanda1420.00173
EDP School1510.00193
Berk Trade and Business School1520.00223
Continental School of Beauty Culture-Mattydale1520.00223
Gemological Institute of America-New York1600.00283
Institute of Culinary Education (this campus)5890.00973

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Institute of Culinary Education recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Alice Lloyd College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Institute of Culinary Education vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

NY

Institute of Culinary Education

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
589
Data year
2024

KY

Alice Lloyd College

1.70 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#928
Enrollment
589
Data year
2024

MO

Concordia Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
589
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$36,663
Median Earnings (10yr)
$47,865
Loan Repayment (3yr)
79%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,140 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Institute of Culinary Education, both outside NY so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Institute of Culinary Education safe?
Institute of Culinary Education has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Christine Valmy International School for Esthetics, Skin Care & Makeup (0.00/1k); Access Careers (0.00/1k); Empire Beauty School-Manhattan (0.00/1k); Erie 1 BOCES (0.00/1k); Metropolitan Learning Institute (0.00/1k); Onondaga Cortland Madison BOCES (0.00/1k); Access Careers-Islandia (0.00/1k); Eastern Suffolk BOCES (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Institute of Culinary Education?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Institute of Culinary Education reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Institute of Culinary Education compare to similar schools?
Institute of Culinary Education reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Alice Lloyd College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Alice Lloyd College (1.70/1k); Concordia Seminary (0.00/1k); University of Valley Forge (6.79/1k); Cleveland University-Kansas City (1.70/1k); Polytech Adult Education (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Christine Valmy International School for Esthetics, Skin Care & Makeup (0.00/1k); Access Careers (0.00/1k); Empire Beauty School-Manhattan (0.00/1k); Erie 1 BOCES (0.00/1k); Metropolitan Learning Institute (0.00/1k); Onondaga Cortland Madison BOCES (0.00/1k); Access Careers-Islandia (0.00/1k); Eastern Suffolk BOCES (0.00/1k).
Does Institute of Culinary Education have fire safety data?
Institute of Culinary Education has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.