South Hamilton, MA · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary

Across 2022–2024, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary reported 1 incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section, and the yearly count fell over that span (largest filed category: Rape). Nearby same-state same-level comparison: Nichols College.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#8
MA rank
1,352
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 165945 · Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-REPORT

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UPPER #8 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Lively Technical College · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-DOWN ↓ 100%
  • CAT-LEAD Rape
  • ENR-SMALL 1,352
  • FIRE-REPORT 1 fire

Nearest enrollment peer: Lively Technical College (+0.00/1k)

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-REPORT · peer Lively Technical College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-DOWN · CAT-LEAD · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-REPORT. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Lively Technical College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Gordon-Conwell on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MA 4-year peers in this comparison, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary is larger than 47% and safer-reporting than 64% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105016.833.650.467.2Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Gordon-Conwell Theological…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Gordon-Conwell Theological…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Massachusetts School of Law2730.00064
Hellenic College-Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology2740.00364
Longy School of Music of Bard College3170.00664
Springfield College-Regional, Online, and Continuing Education3800.00864
Franklin W Olin College of Engineering4052.471153
New England College of Optometry5151.941458
Laboure College of Healthcare5300.001764
Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology7440.001964
Hampshire College8444.742225
Boston Architectural College8530.002564
The New England Conservatory of Music8535.862522
Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary (this campus)1,3520.004764

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

What actually gets reported at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary

Across 3 reporting years, the only Clery Act category with a recorded on-campus incident here is Rape.

The remaining 10 categories were reported with no on-campus incidents, among them Aggravated Assault, Arson, Burglary and Fondling. Under the Clery Act that zero is an affirmative report that nothing in the category occurred, not an absence of data, which is why the table below lists those rows rather than dropping them.

Counts describe incidents reported under the Clery Act for the on-campus geography. Reporting practice varies between institutions, so counts are not a direct measure of relative safety.

Crime Statistics by Year

11 categories 3 reporting years on-campus only

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary: Criminal Offenses by year

Declining 100% (1 → 0 incidents)

00.511.5 202220232024 On-campus incidents, 2022: 1On-campus incidents, 2023: 0On-campus incidents, 2024: 0 1 0 ▼ -100.0%
Read the chart as text
Period On-campus incidents
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
Crime Type 202420232022
Rape 001
Aggravated Assault 000
Arson 000
Burglary 000
Fondling 000
Incest 000
Motor Vehicle Theft 000
Murder / Non-Negligent Manslaughter 000
Negligent Manslaughter 000
Robbery 000
Statutory Rape 000

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Table figures show the Criminal Offenses section; other Clery tables are separate

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 1 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

36 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
36 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MA

Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
1,352
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,267 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, both outside MA so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary safe?
Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Nichols College (4.31/1k); College of Our Lady of the Elms (0.00/1k); Massachusetts Maritime Academy (0.00/1k); University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (16.12/1k); Anna Maria College (4.16/1k); New England Law-Boston (0.00/1k); Gordon College (3.13/1k); Dean College (8.24/1k).
What crimes are reported at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary compare to similar schools?
Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Northwest University-Center for Online and Extended Education. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Northwest University-Center for Online and Extended Education (1.48/1k); Lively Technical College (0.00/1k); Wright State University-Lake Campus (1.47/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); The University of Montana-Western (3.68/1k). Same-state same-level set: Nichols College (4.31/1k); College of Our Lady of the Elms (0.00/1k); Massachusetts Maritime Academy (0.00/1k); University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (16.12/1k); Anna Maria College (4.16/1k); New England Law-Boston (0.00/1k); Gordon College (3.13/1k); Dean College (8.24/1k).
Does Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary have fire safety data?
Yes. Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. 1 fire was reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.