Fort Myers, FL · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Fort Myers Technical College

Fort Myers Technical College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#12
FL rank
764
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Fort Myers Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 135267 · Fort Myers Technical College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #12 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Southwestern Adventist University · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 764
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Southwestern Adventist University (+0.00/1k)

Fort Myers Technical College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Southwestern Adventist University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Southwestern Adventist University (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Fort Myers Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Fort Myers Technical

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Fort on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Fort Myers Technical College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Fort Myers Technical College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 FL 2-year peers in this comparison, Fort Myers Technical College is larger than 81% and safer-reporting than 19% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Fort Myers Technical College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Fort Myers Technical College: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Withlacoochee Technical College2780.00019
Taylor College3080.00319
Florida Education Institute3180.00619
CBT Technology Institute-Cutler Bay3260.00819
Fortis College-Cutler Bay3652.74113
Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Orlando3760.001419
Cambridge College of Healthcare & Technology3810.001719
Lindsey Hopkins Technical College3937.63190
Fortis College-Orange Park3992.51228
Radford M Locklin Technical College4320.002519
Med College4550.002819
Fort Myers Technical College (this campus)7640.008119

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Fort Myers Technical College is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Independence Community College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Fort Myers Technical College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

FL

Fort Myers Technical College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
764
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$36,467
Median Earnings (10yr)
$40,082

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,173 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Fort Myers Technical College, both outside FL so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fort Myers Technical College safe?
Fort Myers Technical College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Fortis Institute-Pensacola (0.00/1k); Universal Technical Institute-Orlando (2.54/1k); Universal Technical Institute-South Florida Miramar (0.00/1k); National Aviation Academy of Tampa Bay (0.00/1k); H W Brewster Technical College (0.00/1k); Miami Lakes Educational Center and Technical College (0.00/1k); FVI School of Nursing and Technology (1.51/1k); Jones Technical Institute (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Fort Myers Technical College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Fort Myers Technical College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Fort Myers Technical College compare to similar schools?
Fort Myers Technical College reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Independence Community College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Independence Community College (7.85/1k); Southwestern Adventist University (0.00/1k); Institute for Business and Technology (1.31/1k); University of Providence (0.00/1k); Bryan College of Health Sciences (22.22/1k). Same-state same-level set: Fortis Institute-Pensacola (0.00/1k); Universal Technical Institute-Orlando (2.54/1k); Universal Technical Institute-South Florida Miramar (0.00/1k); National Aviation Academy of Tampa Bay (0.00/1k); H W Brewster Technical College (0.00/1k); Miami Lakes Educational Center and Technical College (0.00/1k); FVI School of Nursing and Technology (1.51/1k); Jones Technical Institute (0.00/1k).
Does Fort Myers Technical College have fire safety data?
Fort Myers Technical College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.