Florence, SC · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Florence-Darlington Technical College

Florence-Darlington Technical College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#9
SC rank
3,522
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Florence-Darlington Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 218025 · Florence-Darlington Technical College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UPPER #9 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Aspen University · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 3,522
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Aspen University (+0.00/1k)

Florence-Darlington Technical College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Aspen University. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Aspen University (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Florence-Darlington Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Florence-Darlington Technical College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Florence-Darlington on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Florence-Darlington Technical College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Florence-Darlington Technical College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 23 SC 2-year peers in this comparison, Florence-Darlington Technical College is larger than 68% and safer-reporting than 36% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 23Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 59 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 55 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 73 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 45 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 77 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 41 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 18Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 32 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 82 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 27 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 23 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 18 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 9 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 9Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 5 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 5Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 91 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 95 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 27Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 32Florence-Darlington Techni…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 68 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 23
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 59, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 55, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 73, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 45, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 77, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 41, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 18
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 32, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 82, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 27, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 23, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 18, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 9, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 9
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 5, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 5
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 91, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 95, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 27
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 32
  • Florence-Darlington Techni…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 68, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Southeastern College-Charleston2264.4205
Southeastern College-Columbia2670.00536
Fortis College-Columbia5821.7299
Williamsburg Technical College6680.001436
Denmark Technical College6754.44180
Galen Health Institutes-Myrtle Beach7430.002336
University of South Carolina-Salkehatchie7990.002736
University of South Carolina-Union1,4020.003236
Northeastern Technical College1,4280.003636
University of South Carolina-Sumter1,8450.544118
Orangeburg Calhoun Technical College2,1060.004536
Florence-Darlington Technical College (this campus)3,5220.006836

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Florence-Darlington Technical College is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Jackson State Community College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

54 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
54 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0

Florence-Darlington Technical College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

SC

Florence-Darlington Technical College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
3,522
Data year
2024

FL

Lynn University

5.98 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,718
Enrollment
3,514
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Florence-Darlington Technical College sits on price and outcomes

See South Carolina's cost ranking

At $2,004, Florence-Darlington Technical College's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 81 South Carolina colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $16,525.

$2,004
average net price
$16,525
South Carolina median
2.2×
six-year earnings to median debt
$5,119
reported income-bracket spread

Aid here is steeply income-scaled. Families reporting under $30,000 of income record a net price of $1,589, while those above $110,000 record $6,708 - roughly 4.2 times as much. A published average of $2,004 therefore describes very few families well; the bracket nearest your own income is the more useful figure.

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $27,042 - about 13.5 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. Only 27% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$4,636
Out-of-State Tuition
$6,772
Avg Net Price
$2,004
Median Debt
$12,250
Pell Grant Recipients
47%
How does this cost rank in SC? →

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$27,042
Median Earnings (10yr)
$32,748
Loan Repayment (3yr)
42%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,235 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Florence-Darlington Technical College, both outside SC so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Florence-Darlington Technical College safe?
Florence-Darlington Technical College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Central Carolina Technical College (0.35/1k); University of South Carolina-Lancaster (0.00/1k); Technical College of the Lowcountry (0.00/1k); Aiken Technical College (0.00/1k); York Technical College (0.00/1k); Orangeburg Calhoun Technical College (0.00/1k); Piedmont Technical College (0.00/1k); University of South Carolina-Sumter (0.54/1k).
What crimes are reported at Florence-Darlington Technical College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Florence-Darlington Technical College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Florence-Darlington Technical College compare to similar schools?
Florence-Darlington Technical College reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Jackson State Community College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Jackson State Community College (0.28/1k); Lynn University (5.98/1k); Western New Mexico University (0.85/1k); Aspen University (0.00/1k); Northern Wyoming Community College District (1.70/1k). Same-state same-level set: Central Carolina Technical College (0.35/1k); University of South Carolina-Lancaster (0.00/1k); Technical College of the Lowcountry (0.00/1k); Aiken Technical College (0.00/1k); York Technical College (0.00/1k); Orangeburg Calhoun Technical College (0.00/1k); Piedmont Technical College (0.00/1k); University of South Carolina-Sumter (0.54/1k).
Does Florence-Darlington Technical College have fire safety data?
Florence-Darlington Technical College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.