Tacoma, WA · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Faith International University

Faith International University reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
464
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Faith International University reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 443049 · Faith International University 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Eastern West Virginia Community · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 464
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Eastern West Virginia Community and Technical College (+0.00/1k)

Faith International University sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Eastern West Virginia Community and Technical College. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Eastern West Virginia Community and Technical College (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Faith International University reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Faith International University

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Faith on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Faith International University's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Faith International University was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 WA 4-year peers in this comparison, Faith International University is larger than 14% and safer-reporting than 72% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.937.856.775.6Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Faith International Univer…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Faith International Univer…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Great Northern University480.00072
Seattle Institute of East Asian Medicine500.00372
Seattle Film Institute850.00672
Northwest College of Art & Design1397.19814
The Seattle School of Theology & Psychology2430.001172
Faith International University (this campus)4640.001472
Cornish College of the Arts5059.90178
Northwest Indian College6364.721925
Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences6650.002272
Bastyr University7340.002572
Antioch University-Seattle7710.002872
Heritage University9370.003172

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Faith International University recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: New Mexico Military Institute.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Faith International University vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

WA

Faith International University

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
464
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Faith International University sits on price and outcomes

See Washington's cost ranking

At $22,662, Faith International University's reported average net price is cheaper than 72% among 83 Washington colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $14,091.

$22,662
average net price
$14,091
Washington median
3.0×
six-year earnings to median debt

Six-year median earnings of $52,989 run about 2.3 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$8,850
Out-of-State Tuition
$8,850
Avg Net Price
$22,662
Median Debt
$17,650
Pell Grant Recipients
47%
How does this cost rank in WA? →

Outcomes

Retention Rate
67%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$52,989
Median Earnings (10yr)
$51,006
Loan Repayment (3yr)
59%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,125 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Faith International University safe?
Faith International University has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 464 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is New Mexico Military Institute. Same-state same-level set: Cornish College of the Arts (9.90/1k); Northwest Indian College (4.72/1k); Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences (0.00/1k); The Seattle School of Theology & Psychology (0.00/1k); Bastyr University (0.00/1k); Antioch University-Seattle (0.00/1k); Northwest College of Art & Design (7.19/1k); Seattle Film Institute (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Faith International University?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Faith International University reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Faith International University compare to similar schools?
Faith International University reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than New Mexico Military Institute. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: New Mexico Military Institute (2.16/1k); Eastern West Virginia Community and Technical College (0.00/1k); Divine Mercy University (0.00/1k); Bryant & Stratton College-Syracuse North (0.00/1k); Escuela de Artes Plasticas y Diseno de Puerto Rico (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Cornish College of the Arts (9.90/1k); Northwest Indian College (4.72/1k); Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences (0.00/1k); The Seattle School of Theology & Psychology (0.00/1k); Bastyr University (0.00/1k); Antioch University-Seattle (0.00/1k); Northwest College of Art & Design (7.19/1k); Seattle Film Institute (0.00/1k).
Does Faith International University have fire safety data?
Faith International University has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.