Stone Park, IL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
136
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 481748 · Empire Beauty School-Stone Park 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Hair Professionals School of · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 136
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology (+0.00/1k)

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Empire Beauty School-Stone

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Empire on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Empire Beauty School-Stone Park's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 IL Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Empire Beauty School-Stone Park is larger than 56% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Empire Beauty School-Stone…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Empire Beauty School-Stone…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Hair Professionals Career College550.0003
Educators of Beauty College of Cosmetology-Sterling590.0033
Steven Papageorge Hair Academy600.0063
Cannella School of Hair Design-Chicago640.0083
Oehrlein School of Cosmetology650.00113
Estelle Medical Academy660.00143
Illinois Media School-Chicago Campus660.00143
Larry's Barber College680.00193
Cameo Beauty Academy820.00223
CALC Institute of Technology830.00253
Stellar Career College830.00253
Empire Beauty School-Stone Park (this campus)1360.00563

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Empire Beauty School-Stone Park has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

IL

Empire Beauty School-Stone Park

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
136
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Empire Beauty School-Stone Park sits on price and outcomes

See Illinois's cost ranking

At $16,751, Empire Beauty School-Stone Park's reported average net price is cheaper than 52% among 178 Illinois colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $15,405.

$16,751
average net price
$15,405
Illinois median
1.5×
six-year earnings to median debt

Median earnings six years after entry ($20,172) are less than 1.2 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling. Only 39% complete within six years. Most students here do not finish, which is the single most important number on this page for anyone weighing the cost.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$20,172
Median Earnings (10yr)
$24,407
Loan Repayment (3yr)
35%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,339 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Empire Beauty School-Stone Park safe?
Empire Beauty School-Stone Park has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 136 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology. Same-state same-level set: Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Elgin (0.00/1k); Universal Spa Training Academy (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Glendale Heights (0.00/1k); Estelle Skin Care and Spa Institute (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Peoria (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Chicago (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Chicago NE (6.25/1k).
What crimes are reported at Empire Beauty School-Stone Park?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Empire Beauty School-Stone Park reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Empire Beauty School-Stone Park compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in IL; same-state same-level scored peers include Hair Professionals School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Elgin (0.00/1k); Universal Spa Training Academy (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Glendale Heights (0.00/1k); Estelle Skin Care and Spa Institute (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Peoria (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Chicago (0.00/1k); Tricoci University of Beauty Culture-Chicago NE (6.25/1k).
Does Empire Beauty School-Stone Park have fire safety data?
Empire Beauty School-Stone Park has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.