Detroit, MI · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Ecumenical Theological Seminary

Ecumenical Theological Seminary reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
63
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Ecumenical Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 247162 · Ecumenical Theological Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH La Belle Beauty School · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 63
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: La Belle Beauty School (+0.00/1k)

Ecumenical Theological Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer La Belle Beauty School. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is La Belle Beauty School (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Ecumenical Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Ecumenical Theological Seminary

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Ecumenical on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Ecumenical Theological Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Ecumenical Theological Seminary was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MI 4-year peers in this comparison, Ecumenical Theological Seminary is larger than 0% and safer-reporting than 53% - the smaller, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.927.841.755.6Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Ecumenical Theological Sem…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Ecumenical Theological Sem…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Ecumenical Theological Seminary (this campus)630.00053
Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit750.00353
Cranbrook Academy of Art1138.8568
Kuyper College1610.00853
Michigan School of Psychology1900.001153
Great Lakes Christian College2100.001453
Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine3460.001753
Sacred Heart Major Seminary3510.001953
Calvin Theological Seminary36721.80220
Western Theological Seminary3972.522536
Thomas M Cooley Law School4200.002853
Arizona College of Nursing-Southfield5940.003153

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Ecumenical Theological Seminary has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: La Belle Beauty School.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Ecumenical Theological Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MI

Ecumenical Theological Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
63
Data year
2024

FL

La Belle Beauty School

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
63
Data year
2024

MS

Vaughn Beauty College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
63
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,059 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Ecumenical Theological Seminary safe?
Ecumenical Theological Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 63 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is La Belle Beauty School. Same-state same-level set: Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit (0.00/1k); Cranbrook Academy of Art (8.85/1k); Kuyper College (0.00/1k); Michigan School of Psychology (0.00/1k); Great Lakes Christian College (0.00/1k); Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine (0.00/1k); Sacred Heart Major Seminary (0.00/1k); Calvin Theological Seminary (21.80/1k).
What crimes are reported at Ecumenical Theological Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Ecumenical Theological Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Ecumenical Theological Seminary compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is La Belle Beauty School at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in MI; same-state same-level scored peers include Yeshiva Gedolah of Greater Detroit (0.00/1k); Cranbrook Academy of Art (8.85/1k); Kuyper College (0.00/1k); Michigan School of Psychology (0.00/1k); Great Lakes Christian College (0.00/1k); Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine (0.00/1k); Sacred Heart Major Seminary (0.00/1k); Calvin Theological Seminary (21.80/1k).
Does Ecumenical Theological Seminary have fire safety data?
Ecumenical Theological Seminary has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.