Fall River, MA · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Diman Regional Technical Institute

Diman Regional Technical Institute reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
17
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Diman Regional Technical Institute reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 165608 · Diman Regional Technical Institute 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UNK State rank n/a
  • PEER-FINISH Conway School of Landscape · ±0.00
  • ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 17
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Conway School of Landscape Design (+0.00/1k)

Diman Regional Technical Institute sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Conway School of Landscape Design. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Conway School of Landscape Design (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Diman Regional Technical Institute reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Diman Regional Technical

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Diman on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Diman Regional Technical Institute's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Diman Regional Technical Institute was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 30 MA Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Diman Regional Technical Institute is larger than 3% and safer-reporting than 3% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 7 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 10 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 21 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 24 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 34 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 34 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 41 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 45 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 52 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 55 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 59 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 62 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 66 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 76 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 79 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 90 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 93 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Diman Regional Technical I…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 7, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 10, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 21, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 24, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 34, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 34, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 41, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 45, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 52, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 55, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 59, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 62, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 66, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 76, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 79, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 90, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 93, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Diman Regional Technical I…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford150.0003
Diman Regional Technical Institute (this campus)170.0033
DiGrigoli School of Cosmetology210.0073
Rob Roy Academy-Taunton2343.48100
Technology Learning Center310.00143
Shawsheen Valley School of Practical Nursing370.00173
Alexander Academy390.00213
Charles H McCann Technical School410.00243
Blackstone Valley Vocational Regional School District420.00283
Massachusetts School of Barbering440.00313
Assabet Valley Regional Technical School470.00343
EINE Inc470.00343

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

The Criminal Offenses section for Diman Regional Technical Institute is all zeros for 2024, 2023, 2022 - under Clery those are affirmative "no incident" reports, not missing rows. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Conway School of Landscape Design.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Diman Regional Technical Institute vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MA

Diman Regional Technical Institute

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
17
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Diman Regional Technical Institute sits on price and outcomes

See Massachusetts's cost ranking

At $21,734, Diman Regional Technical Institute's reported average net price is cheaper than 42% among 117 Massachusetts colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $24,402.

$21,734
average net price
$24,402
Massachusetts median
$53
reported income-bracket spread

Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $23,192 and those above $110,000 report $23,139, a difference of just $53. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.

74% complete within six years, so roughly 26% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. A completion rate describes the cohort, not an individual student's likelihood of finishing.

Academic & Financial Profile

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
39%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 250 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Diman Regional Technical Institute safe?
Diman Regional Technical Institute has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 17 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Conway School of Landscape Design. Same-state same-level set: Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford (0.00/1k); DiGrigoli School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Rob Roy Academy-Taunton (43.48/1k); Technology Learning Center (0.00/1k); Shawsheen Valley School of Practical Nursing (0.00/1k); Alexander Academy (0.00/1k); Charles H McCann Technical School (0.00/1k); Blackstone Valley Vocational Regional School District (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Diman Regional Technical Institute?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Diman Regional Technical Institute reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Diman Regional Technical Institute compare to similar schools?
Diman Regional Technical Institute reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Conway School of Landscape Design. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Conway School of Landscape Design (0.00/1k); Talmudical Institute of Upstate New York (0.00/1k); B M Spurr School of Practical Nursing (58.82/1k); DeVry University-Texas (0.00/1k); Luckes Beauty Academy LLC (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Rob Roy Academy-New Bedford (0.00/1k); DiGrigoli School of Cosmetology (0.00/1k); Rob Roy Academy-Taunton (43.48/1k); Technology Learning Center (0.00/1k); Shawsheen Valley School of Practical Nursing (0.00/1k); Alexander Academy (0.00/1k); Charles H McCann Technical School (0.00/1k); Blackstone Valley Vocational Regional School District (0.00/1k).
Does Diman Regional Technical Institute have fire safety data?
Diman Regional Technical Institute has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.