Saint Louis, MO · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Covenant Theological Seminary

Covenant Theological Seminary reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#2
MO rank
550
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Covenant Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 177126 · Covenant Theological Seminary 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-TOP · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-TOP #2 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Ogle School Hair Skin · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 550
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Stafford (+0.00/1k)

Covenant Theological Seminary sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-TOP · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Stafford. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-TOP · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Stafford (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Covenant Theological Seminary reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Covenant Theological Seminary

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Covenant on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Covenant Theological Seminary's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Covenant Theological Seminary was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 MO 4-year peers in this comparison, Covenant Theological Seminary is larger than 58% and safer-reporting than 42% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Covenant Theological Semin…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Covenant Theological Semin…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Conception Seminary College630.00042
Eden Theological Seminary720.00342
Stevens-The Institute of Business & Arts890.00642
Aquinas Institute of Theology1100.00842
Urshan Graduate School of Theology1160.001142
Bolivar Technical College1440.001442
Bryan University1530.001742
Ponce Health Sciences University-St Louis1640.001942
Nazarene Theological Seminary16811.902211
Central Christian College of the Bible1890.002542
Southeast Missouri Hospital College of Nursing and Health Sciences1970.002842
Covenant Theological Seminary (this campus)5500.005842

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Covenant Theological Seminary has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Kentucky Christian University.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Covenant Theological Seminary vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

MO

Covenant Theological Seminary

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
550
Data year
2024

Academic & Financial Profile

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,135 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Covenant Theological Seminary, both outside MO so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Covenant Theological Seminary safe?
Covenant Theological Seminary has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Barnes-Jewish College Goldfarb School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Stephens College (0.00/1k); Concordia Seminary (0.00/1k); Hannibal-LaGrange University (0.00/1k); Urshan University (0.00/1k); Westminster College (29.69/1k); University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis (13.89/1k); Mission University (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Covenant Theological Seminary?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Covenant Theological Seminary reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Covenant Theological Seminary compare to similar schools?
Covenant Theological Seminary reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Kentucky Christian University. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Kentucky Christian University (7.27/1k); Southern Technical College (1.82/1k); Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Stafford (0.00/1k); Salem College (12.75/1k); Moore College of Art and Design (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Barnes-Jewish College Goldfarb School of Nursing (0.00/1k); Stephens College (0.00/1k); Concordia Seminary (0.00/1k); Hannibal-LaGrange University (0.00/1k); Urshan University (0.00/1k); Westminster College (29.69/1k); University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis (13.89/1k); Mission University (0.00/1k).
Does Covenant Theological Seminary have fire safety data?
Yes. Covenant Theological Seminary reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.