Columbia, SC · Clery Act 2024 · Private Nonprofit

Columbia International University

Columbia International University reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#7
SC rank
2,914
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Columbia International University reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 217925 · Columbia International University 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-UPPER #7 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Orange Technical College-East Campus · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 2,914
  • FIRE-ZERO 0 fires filed

Nearest enrollment peer: Orange Technical College-East Campus (+0.00/1k)

Columbia International University sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO · peer Orange Technical College-East Campus. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UPPER · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-ZERO. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Orange Technical College-East Campus (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Columbia International University reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Columbia International University

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Columbia on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Columbia International University's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Columbia International University was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 SC 4-year peers in this comparison, Columbia International University is larger than 67% and safer-reporting than 72% - the larger, safer-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105018.937.856.775.6Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 58Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 36Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 33Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 56Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 39Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 47Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 69Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 31Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 44Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 61Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 64Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 28Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 53Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 25Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 50Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 67Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 42Columbia International Uni…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 72
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 58
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 36
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 33
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 56
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 39
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 47
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 69
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 31
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 44
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 61
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 64
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 28
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 53
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 25
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 50
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 67
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 42
  • Columbia International Uni…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 72
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Clinton College1260.00072
American College of the Building Arts1550.00372
Morris College38313.0563
Sherman College of Chiropractic3870.00872
South University-Columbia5040.001172
Voorhees University5780.001472
Allen University6100.001772
Charleston School of Law6920.001972
Erskine College9120.002272
Southern Wesleyan University9800.002572
Presbyterian College1,0956.392822
Columbia International University (this campus)2,9140.006772

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Columbia International University has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Orange Technical College-East Campus.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Fire Safety

Year Fires Inj. Deaths Cat I Cat II
2024 0 0 0 0 0

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 1
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 1 0

Columbia International University vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

SC

Columbia International University

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
2,914
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Columbia International University sits on price and outcomes

See South Carolina's cost ranking

At $26,036, Columbia International University's reported average net price is cheaper than 89% among 81 South Carolina colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $16,525.

$26,036
average net price
$16,525
South Carolina median
1.7×
six-year earnings to median debt
$7,796
reported income-bracket spread

Net price moves with income here, but not sharply: $21,955 for families reporting under $30,000 against $29,751 above $110,000, a difference of $7,796. Aid narrows the gap without closing it, so the $26,036 average sits reasonably close to what most brackets report.

Median earnings six years after entry ($33,929) are less than 1.3 years of the reported net price. That is a thin margin, and it is the figure worth pressing the school on before enrolling.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$27,900
Out-of-State Tuition
$27,900
Avg Net Price
$26,036
Median Debt
$20,000
Pell Grant Recipients
34%
How does this cost rank in SC? →

Admissions

Acceptance Rate
94%
ACT Average
21

Outcomes

4-Year Graduation Rate
55%
Retention Rate
53%
Median Earnings (6yr)
$33,929
Median Earnings (10yr)
$38,951
Loan Repayment (3yr)
74%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,251 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Columbia International University, both outside SC so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Columbia International University safe?
Columbia International University has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Bob Jones University (1.10/1k); South Carolina State University (8.95/1k); Medical University of South Carolina (8.01/1k); Furman University (9.79/1k); North Greenville University (3.04/1k); University of South Carolina Beaufort (3.17/1k); Strayer University-South Carolina (1.42/1k); Citadel Military College of South Carolina (2.90/1k).
What crimes are reported at Columbia International University?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Columbia International University reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Columbia International University compare to similar schools?
Columbia International University reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Orange Technical College-East Campus. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Orange Technical College-East Campus (0.00/1k); Snead State Community College (0.00/1k); Benedictine University (1.37/1k); Bard College (7.56/1k); Oberlin College (3.78/1k). Same-state same-level set: Bob Jones University (1.10/1k); South Carolina State University (8.95/1k); Medical University of South Carolina (8.01/1k); Furman University (9.79/1k); North Greenville University (3.04/1k); University of South Carolina Beaufort (3.17/1k); Strayer University-South Carolina (1.42/1k); Citadel Military College of South Carolina (2.90/1k).
Does Columbia International University have fire safety data?
Yes. Columbia International University reports fire safety data for on-campus residential facilities, including total fires, injuries, deaths, and fire damage categories. No fires were reported in the most recent year.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.