IL
Chicago Professional Center
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Prospect Heights, IL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
Chicago Professional Center
Chicago Professional Center reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 95
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Chicago Professional Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 492078 · Chicago Professional Center 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Cortiva Institute · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 95
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Cortiva Institute (+0.00/1k)
Chicago Professional Center sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Cortiva Institute. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Cortiva Institute (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Chicago Professional Center reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Chicago Professional Center
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Chicago on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Chicago Professional Center · this campus · lowest 0
Chicago Professional Center — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Jenks Beauty College · highest peer 0
Jenks Beauty College — highest peer
0 per 1,000 students
- Cortiva Institute · near 0
Cortiva Institute — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Saint Joseph Seminary College · near 0
Saint Joseph Seminary College — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Oak Hills Christian College · near 0
Oak Hills Christian College — near
0 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Chicago Professional Center's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Chicago Professional Center was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 IL Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Chicago Professional Center is larger than 69% and safer-reporting than 3% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
- Chicago Professional Center: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Aesthetics & Cosmetology | 39 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 |
| Phipps Academy of Barbering | 39 | 0.00 | 0 | 3 |
| Reflections Academy of Beauty | 40 | 0.00 | 6 | 3 |
| Gem City College | 41 | 0.00 | 8 | 3 |
| Empire Beauty School-Vernon Hills | 50 | 40.00 | 11 | 0 |
| Cannella School of Hair Design-Villa Park | 51 | 0.00 | 14 | 3 |
| Educators of Beauty College of Cosmetology-Peru | 52 | 0.00 | 17 | 3 |
| Ms Roberts Academy of Beauty Culture | 52 | 0.00 | 17 | 3 |
| Professional's Choice Hair Design Academy | 53 | 0.00 | 22 | 3 |
| University of Aesthetics & Cosmetology | 53 | 0.00 | 22 | 3 |
| Networks Barber College | 54 | 0.00 | 28 | 3 |
| Chicago Professional Center (this campus) | 95 | 0.00 | 69 | 3 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Chicago Professional Center has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Cortiva Institute.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Chicago Professional Center vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
FL
Cortiva Institute
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
LA
Saint Joseph Seminary College
0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
Academic & Financial Profile
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,262 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Cortiva Institute
St. Petersburg, FL · 95 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Saint Joseph Seminary College
St. Benedict, LA · 95 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Oak Hills Christian College
Bemidji, MN · 95 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
St Joseph School of Nursing
Nashua, NH · 95 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Jenks Beauty College
Jenks, OK · 95 enrolled
Safety Score 0.00
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago Professional Center safe?
Chicago Professional Center has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). With 95 enrolled students it sits under the 500-student ranking cutoff; a size peer on file is Cortiva Institute. Same-state same-level set: Educators of Beauty College of Cosmetology-Rockford (0.00/1k); The Aveda Institute of Beauty and Wellness Chicago (0.00/1k); Debutantes School of Cosmetology and Nail Technology (0.00/1k); Pivot Point Academy (0.00/1k); Hair Professionals Career College (0.00/1k); CALC Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); Stellar Career College (0.00/1k); Cameo Beauty Academy (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Chicago Professional Center?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Chicago Professional Center reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Chicago Professional Center compare to similar schools?
A similar-enrollment comparison point is Cortiva Institute at 0.00 score-category incidents per 1,000 in IL; same-state same-level scored peers include Educators of Beauty College of Cosmetology-Rockford (0.00/1k); The Aveda Institute of Beauty and Wellness Chicago (0.00/1k); Debutantes School of Cosmetology and Nail Technology (0.00/1k); Pivot Point Academy (0.00/1k); Hair Professionals Career College (0.00/1k); CALC Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); Stellar Career College (0.00/1k); Cameo Beauty Academy (0.00/1k).
Does Chicago Professional Center have fire safety data?
Chicago Professional Center has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.