Miami, FL · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#46
FL rank
508
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 449083 · CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-MID #46 in state
  • PEER-FINISH Luther Rice College & · ±0.00
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 508
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Luther Rice College & Seminary (+0.00/1k)

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Luther Rice College & Seminary. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-MID · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Luther Rice College & Seminary (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around CBT Technology Institute-Main

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest CBT on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 37 FL 2-year peers in this comparison, CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus is larger than 47% and safer-reporting than 22% - the smaller, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 44 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 50 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 53 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 56 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 17Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 64 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 67 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 69 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 39 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 72 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 75 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 36 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 14Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 33 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 31 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 28 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 25 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 8Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 78 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 19Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 83 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 22 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 86 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 17 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 89 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 14 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 92 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 11 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 11Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 8 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 6 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22CBT Technology Institute-M…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 47 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 22
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 17
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 39, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 14
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 31, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 8
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 19
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 22, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 89, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 11
  • Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
  • CBT Technology Institute-M…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 22
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
Concorde Career Institute-Tampa1580.00022
Meridian College1630.00322
Compu-Med Vocational Careers Corp16911.8360
Concorde Career Institute-Jacksonville2254.4486
Riveroak Technical College2500.001122
Withlacoochee Technical College2780.001422
Taylor College3080.001722
Florida Education Institute3180.001922
CBT Technology Institute-Cutler Bay3260.002222
Fortis College-Cutler Bay3652.74258
Aviation Institute of Maintenance-Orlando3760.002822
CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus (this campus)5080.004722

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Luther Rice College & Seminary.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 0 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

FL

CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
508
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus sits on price and outcomes

See Florida's cost ranking

At $17,842, CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus's reported average net price is cheaper than 44% among 263 Florida colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $19,849.

$17,842
average net price
$19,849
Florida median
4.2×
six-year earnings to median debt

Six-year median earnings of $35,733 run about 2.0 times the annual net price. The margin is real but narrow, so how many years of price a student actually pays matters a great deal here. 90% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Tuition & Costs

In-State Tuition
$14,030
Out-of-State Tuition
$14,030
Avg Net Price
$17,842
Median Debt
$8,550
Pell Grant Recipients
92%
How does this cost rank in FL? →

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$35,733
Median Earnings (10yr)
$29,534
Loan Repayment (3yr)
48%

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,136 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus, both outside FL so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus safe?
CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Marion Technical College (0.00/1k); New Professions Technical Institute (0.00/1k); Fortis Institute-Port Saint Lucie (0.00/1k); CBT Technology Institute-Hialeah (0.00/1k); Southern Technical College (1.82/1k); Academy for Nursing and Health Occupations (0.00/1k); SABER College (0.00/1k); Med College (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus compare to similar schools?
CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Luther Rice College & Seminary. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Luther Rice College & Seminary (0.00/1k); Bethel College-North Newton (5.89/1k); United Theological Seminary (0.00/1k); Southern California Institute of Technology (0.00/1k); World Mission University (0.00/1k). Same-state same-level set: Marion Technical College (0.00/1k); New Professions Technical Institute (0.00/1k); Fortis Institute-Port Saint Lucie (0.00/1k); CBT Technology Institute-Hialeah (0.00/1k); Southern Technical College (1.82/1k); Academy for Nursing and Health Occupations (0.00/1k); SABER College (0.00/1k); Med College (0.00/1k).
Does CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus have fire safety data?
CBT Technology Institute-Main Campus has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.