Logan, UT · Clery Act 2024 · Public

Bridgerland Technical College

Bridgerland Technical College reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.

0.00
Incidents / 1k students
#1
UT rank
1,682
Enrolled students

0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students

Bridgerland Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey

incidents / 1,000 students
0.00
Criminal Offenses, 2024
0
View my watchlist

Data updated August 2026

Clery Act plate

Sheet 230010 · Bridgerland Technical College 0.00/1k score rate

RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-TOP · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE

  • RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
  • RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
  • ST-TOP #1 in state
  • BELOW-PEER Rocky Mountain University of · 0.59 back
  • ZERO-FILED Zero filed
  • TREND-FLAT Flat
  • CAT-NONE No incidents
  • ENR-SMALL 1,682
  • FIRE-NONE No res filing

Nearest enrollment peer: Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (+0.59/1k)

Bridgerland Technical College sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-TOP · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.

Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-TOP · BELOW-PEER · ZERO-FILED · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (+0.59/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.

Bridgerland Technical College reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.

Peer-rate neighbourhood around Bridgerland Technical College

Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Bridgerland on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.

per 1,000 students

What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Bridgerland Technical College's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.

Source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey (Clery Act) As of 2024

Reporting-period change

What changed in 2024

No change

Bridgerland Technical College was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.

This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.

See national reporting-year changes

Signature insight · size does not equal danger

Campus size vs reported safety rate

Among 32 UT Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Bridgerland Technical College is larger than 87% and safer-reporting than 16% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.

Smaller · Safer-reportingLarger · Safer-reportingSmaller · Higher-reportingLarger · Higher-reporting026.352.578.8105013.126.339.452.5Enrollment size, percentile in sampleSafer-reporting percentile (lower rate)Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 90 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 6Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 84 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 81 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 3Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 77 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 74 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 71 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 68 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 65 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 61 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 58 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 55 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 48 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 45 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 42 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 35 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 35 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 32 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 0Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 29 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 26 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 23 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 19 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 16 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 13 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 10 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 3 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 0 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 94 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 97 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 10Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 100 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 13Bridgerland Technical Coll…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample: 87 · Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate): 16
Enrollment vs Clery incidents per 1,000 (inverted to safety percentile), 2024 reporting year
Read the chart as text
  • Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 90, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 6
  • Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 84, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 3
  • Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 77, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 74, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 71, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 68, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 65, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 55, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 48, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 45, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 35, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 35, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 32, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
  • Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 29, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 26, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 23, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 16, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 13, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 10, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
  • Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 10
  • Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 13
  • Bridgerland Technical Coll…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 87, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 16
Read the chart as a table
CampusEnrollmentRate / 1kSize pctSafety pct
American Beauty Academy-West Valley Campus180.00016
American Beauty Academy200.00316
Bonnie Joseph Academy of Cosmetology & Barbering200.00316
Healing Mountain Massage School430.001016
Mandalyn Academy550.001316
Zion Massage College560.001616
Collectiv Academy700.001916
Top Nails & Hair Beauty School920.002316
Paul Mitchell the School-St. George1090.002616
Acaydia School of Aesthetics1130.002916
Skinworks School of Advanced Skincare1178.55320
Bridgerland Technical College (this campus)1,6820.008716

Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.

Crime Statistics by Year

Across 3 reporting years (2022–2024), Bridgerland Technical College has no non-zero Criminal Offenses cell in the 11 Clery categories this profile tracks. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Northeastern Junior College.

Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present

Arrests & Disciplinary Actions

9 category-year records
Disposition26%47%27%ArrestsDisciplinary referralsNo action
9 reported records
Category Year Arrests Discipline
Drugs 2024 0 0
Liquor 2024 1 0
Weapons 2024 0 0
Drugs 2023 0 0
Liquor 2023 0 0
Weapons 2023 0 0
Drugs 2022 0 0
Liquor 2022 0 0
Weapons 2022 0 0

Bridgerland Technical College vs peer institutions

Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment

Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).

Selected

UT

Bridgerland Technical College

0.00 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
Unranked
Enrollment
1,682
Data year
2024

PA

Bryn Mawr College

4.17 incidents / 1,000 students
National rank
#1,510
Enrollment
1,679
Data year
2024

Cost context

Where Bridgerland Technical College sits on price and outcomes

See Utah's cost ranking

At $2,338, Bridgerland Technical College's reported average net price is among the lowest reported prices among 45 Utah colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $18,659.

$2,338
average net price
$18,659
Utah median

Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $37,818 - about 16.2 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. 70% complete within six years, so roughly 30% leave without the credential - and those students still carry whatever they paid.

Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.

Academic & Financial Profile

Outcomes

Median Earnings (6yr)
$37,818
Median Earnings (10yr)
$38,347

Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.

Similar Institutions

Showing 5 of 1,323 similar institutions by enrollment size.

Nationwide campuses with similar scale or Clery rate

Two Clery-derived peer sets for Bridgerland Technical College, both outside UT so the neighborhoods are not state containment (Similar Institutions and national-rank neighbors above stay enrollment- or rank-based).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Bridgerland Technical College safe?
Bridgerland Technical College has a safety score of 0.00 (2024 on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students). It filed zero 2024 score-category incidents, so it is left unranked against other zeros rather than ordered by invention; same-state same-level campuses on file include Uintah Basin Technical College (0.50/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); Southwest Technical College (2.31/1k); Tooele Technical College (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Salt Lake City (0.00/1k); Cameo College of Essential Beauty (0.00/1k); Medspa Academies (0.00/1k); Renaissance Academie (0.00/1k).
What crimes are reported at Bridgerland Technical College?
None in the Criminal Offenses section. Bridgerland Technical College reported zero in every category in that section for calendar year 2024. VAWA, arrests, disciplinary referrals, and fire records are separate tables.
How does Bridgerland Technical College compare to similar schools?
Bridgerland Technical College reports 100% fewer 2024 score-category incidents per 1,000 than Northeastern Junior College. Scored similar-enrollment peers on this page: Northeastern Junior College (1.78/1k); Bryn Mawr College (4.17/1k); Rocky Mountain University of Health Professions (0.59/1k); Maryland Institute College of Art (6.52/1k); University of New Mexico-Gallup Campus (2.37/1k). Same-state same-level set: Uintah Basin Technical College (0.50/1k); Dixie Technical College (0.00/1k); Southwest Technical College (2.31/1k); Tooele Technical College (0.00/1k); Paul Mitchell the School-Salt Lake City (0.00/1k); Cameo College of Essential Beauty (0.00/1k); Medspa Academies (0.00/1k); Renaissance Academie (0.00/1k).
Does Bridgerland Technical College have fire safety data?
Bridgerland Technical College has no on-campus residential fire filing in this Clery release.

Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.

PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.