PR
Bayamon, PR · Clery Act 2024 · Private For-Profit
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon reported zero incidents in the Clery Criminal Offenses section for 2022–2024. Other Clery tables can still contain reports, and zero here does not mean no risk.
- 0.00
- Incidents / 1k students
- 482
- Enrolled students
0.00 reported score-category incidents per 1,000 students
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Data source U.S. Department of Education, OPE Campus Safety and Security Survey
- incidents / 1,000 students
- 0.00
- Criminal Offenses, 2024
- 0
Data updated August 2026
Clery Act plate
Sheet 419703 · Automeca Technical College-Bayamon 0.00/1k score rate
RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE
- RATE-ZERO 0.00/1k
- RANK-UNK Nat rank n/a
- ST-UNK State rank n/a
- PEER-FINISH Fortis College-Baton Rouge · ±0.00
- ZERO-SMALL <500 enrolled
- TREND-FLAT Flat
- CAT-NONE No incidents
- ENR-SMALL 482
- FIRE-NONE No res filing
Nearest enrollment peer: Fortis College-Baton Rouge (+0.00/1k)
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon sheet RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE · peer Fortis College-Baton Rouge. Codes from this campus OPE filing: score-category rate, national/state rank, named enrollment peer, zero posture, Criminal Offenses trend, lead category, enrollment band, fire filing. Not a moving recommendation.
Clery plate RATE-ZERO · RANK-UNK · ST-UNK · PEER-FINISH · ZERO-SMALL · TREND-FLAT · CAT-NONE · ENR-SMALL · FIRE-NONE. Nearest similar-enrollment peer is Fortis College-Baton Rouge (+0.00/1k). Instrument codes from this campus OPE sheet; compare similarly sized peers before treating any single rate as decisive.
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon reported zero 2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents in the score categories (0.00 per 1,000). Zero in those categories is not a safety proof, other Clery tables and unreported harm can still exist, and zero-report campuses are left unranked against each other.
Peer-rate neighbourhood around Automeca Technical College-Bayamon
Lowest/highest enrollment peers plus campuses nearest Automeca on score-category rate. Full ladder: /rankings/safest-campuses.
- Automeca Technical College-Bayamon · this campus · lowest 0
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon — this campus · lowest
0 per 1,000 students
- Fortis College-Baton Rouge · near 0
Fortis College-Baton Rouge — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Ogle School Hair Skin · near 0
Ogle School Hair Skin Nails-Willowbrook — near
0 per 1,000 students
- Allen College · near 2.07
Allen College — near
2.07 per 1,000 students
- Roger Williams University School · highest peer
Roger Williams University School of Law — highest peer
47.52 per 1,000 students
What this shows Neighbourhood of similar-enrollment peers around Automeca Technical College-Bayamon's 0.00/1k rate, not a full-corpus distribution reprint.
Reporting-period change
What changed in 2024
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon was unchanged from 0 to 0 reported on-campus incidents between the 2023 and 2024 reporting years in the U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey.
This is a change in reported incidents, not a measure of individual safety. Enrollment, reporting practice, and category coverage can affect the count.
See national reporting-year changesSignature insight · size does not equal danger
Campus size vs reported safety rate
Among 37 PR Less than 2-year peers in this comparison, Automeca Technical College-Bayamon is larger than 94% and safer-reporting than 0% - the larger, higher-reporting quadrant. Axes are within-sample percentiles so outliers share the same frame; a higher safety percentile means a lower Clery incidents-per-1,000 rate.
Read the chart as text
- Point 1: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 92, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 2: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 3: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 86, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 4: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 97, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 5: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 83, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 6: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 81, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 7: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 78, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 8: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 100, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 9: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 75, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 10: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 72, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 11: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 69, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 12: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 67, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 13: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 64, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 14: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 61, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 15: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 58, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 16: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 56, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 17: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 53, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 18: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 50, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 19: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 47, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 20: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 44, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 21: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 42, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 22: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 23: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 36, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 24: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 33, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 25: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 26: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 28, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 27: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 25, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 28: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 29: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 19, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 30: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 17, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 31: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 14, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 32: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 11, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 33: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 8, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 34: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 6, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 35: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 3, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Point 36: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 0, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
- Automeca Technical College…: Enrollment size, percentile in sample 94, Safer-reporting percentile (lower rate) 0
Read the chart as a table
| Campus | Enrollment | Rate / 1k | Size pct | Safety pct |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colegio Tecnico de Electricidad Galloza | 7 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 |
| American Technical Institute | 11 | 0.00 | 3 | 0 |
| Rosslyn Training Academy of Cosmetology | 21 | 0.00 | 6 | 0 |
| Puerto Rico Advance Institute | 29 | 0.00 | 8 | 0 |
| Leston College | 49 | 0.00 | 11 | 0 |
| Colegio Mayor de Tecnologia Inc | 56 | 0.00 | 14 | 0 |
| Charlie's Guard-Detective Bureau and Academy Inc | 57 | 0.00 | 17 | 0 |
| Modern Hairstyling Institute-Arecibo | 76 | 0.00 | 19 | 0 |
| Colegio Educativo Tecnologico Industrial Inc | 76 | 0.00 | 19 | 0 |
| Institute of Beauty Careers | 93 | 0.00 | 25 | 0 |
| Industrial Technical College | 109 | 0.00 | 28 | 0 |
| Automeca Technical College-Bayamon (this campus) | 482 | 0.00 | 94 | 0 |
Sample of 12 campuses from the plot (sorted by enrollment). Source: U.S. Department of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey + IPEDS enrollment. Rate = on-campus Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 students; lower is safer-reporting, not a personal-risk forecast.
Crime Statistics by Year
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon recorded zero on-campus Criminal Offenses incidents in every Clery category across 2022–2024. Enrollment peer in this dataset: Pennsylvania State University-Penn State Beaver.
Source: US Dept of Education OPE Campus Safety Survey. Zero-filled category grids are omitted when every cell is zero (progressive surface); other Clery tables remain below when present
Arrests & Disciplinary Actions
9 category-year records| Category | Year | Arrests | Discipline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2024 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2023 | 0 | 0 |
| Drugs | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Liquor | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
| Weapons | 2022 | 0 | 0 |
Automeca Technical College-Bayamon vs peer institutions
Side-by-side safety scores for 3 peers of similar enrollment
Scores are $2024 Criminal Offenses and VAWA incidents per 1,000 enrolled students (lower is fewer in those categories).
PA
Pennsylvania State University-Penn State Beaver
LA
Fortis College-Baton Rouge
Cost context
Where Automeca Technical College-Bayamon sits on price and outcomes
At $3,900, Automeca Technical College-Bayamon's reported average net price is cheaper than 9% among 107 Puerto Rico colleges with a reported figure. The state median is $7,404.
- $3,900
- average net price
- $7,404
- Puerto Rico median
- 7.3×
- six-year earnings to median debt
- $591
- reported income-bracket spread
Price barely responds to income at this institution. Families under $30,000 report $3,718 and those above $110,000 report $4,309, a difference of just $591. Where the curve is this flat, need-based aid is doing little of the work and the sticker figure is close to what most families actually pay.
Six years after enrolling, the median former student who received federal aid reports $21,983 - about 5.6 times one year of the reported net price here. On that ratio the cost is recovered quickly. 77% of students complete within six years, which is high and means the published price is what most students actually pay through to a credential.
Average net price reflects grant and scholarship aid for aided students, not a personal offer. Earnings cover former students who received federal aid; neither measure predicts an individual's outcome.
Academic & Financial Profile
Tuition & Costs
- In-State Tuition
- $9,095
- Out-of-State Tuition
- $9,095
- Avg Net Price
- $3,900
- Median Debt
- $3,030
- Pell Grant Recipients
- 95%
Outcomes
- Median Earnings (6yr)
- $21,983
- Median Earnings (10yr)
- $24,632
- Loan Repayment (3yr)
- 42%
Source: IPEDS & College Scorecard. Methodology.
Similar Institutions
Showing 5 of 1,131 similar institutions by enrollment size.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Automeca Technical College-Bayamon safe?
What crimes are reported at Automeca Technical College-Bayamon?
How does Automeca Technical College-Bayamon compare to similar schools?
Does Automeca Technical College-Bayamon have fire safety data?
Every figure on PlainCampus is rendered directly from federal Clery Act source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on federal Clery Act source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice; the data describes reported on-campus activity, it is not a complete picture of safety at any campus and cannot predict any individual student's experience. See our appropriate use guidance.
PlainCampus is for informational purposes only and does not constitute safety, security, legal, or enrollment advice.